Anti-Immigrant Politics in the Trump Era: Who Is Being Sacrificed

Rights awareness, immigration experience, and public knowledge for Chinese readers in the U.S.

Anti-Immigrant Politics in the Trump Era: Who Is Being Sacrificed

During Donald Trump’s presidency, the focus of U.S. immigration policy shifted from the traditional logic of economic supplementation to a hybrid narrative of national security and identity politics. This shift not only reshaped the priorities of border enforcement but profoundly affected the distribution structure of social resources. The core of anti-immigrant politics was not simply targeting illegal border crossers, but constructing a discourse system of “outsider threat” that blamed domestic economic anxiety, racial tensions, and public service pressure on immigrant groups. This political strategy coalesced a specific voter base in the short term, but in the long run, it sacrificed the basic human rights protection of immigrant communities and also weakened the diverse and inclusive traditions that American society has long relied upon.

The primary group sacrificed was undocumented immigrants and their family members. Strict enforcement measures led to a surge in family separations, with many children falling into guardianship vacuums after their parents were arrested. Furthermore, racial profiling enforcement targeting specific ethnicities exacerbated distrust within communities, making it difficult for immigrant groups to integrate into mainstream society or seek legal protection. This systemic exclusion not only violated basic human rights but also destroyed the economic stability of immigrant communities, forcing a large workforce into the underground economy and further depriving them of labor rights and social security.

Second, low-skilled domestic workers and minority communities in the United States also bore hidden costs in this process. Although anti-immigrant rhetoric claimed to protect domestic workers’ employment, empirical research shows that immigrants often fill industry gaps that domestic labor is unwilling to fill, such as agriculture, construction, and services. Restricting immigrant supply could lead to rising costs in these key industries, pushing up overall prices, ultimately paid by ordinary consumers. Meanwhile, the hostile atmosphere toward immigrants easily triggers hate crimes against Asians, Latinos, and other minorities, causing social division and public safety risks.

Finally, the United States’ own international image and soft power were also eroded. As an immigrant nation, the United States has long positioned itself as a “land of opportunity,” but harsh and inhumane immigration policies formed a sharp contrast with its claimed values. This not only affected global talent’s confidence in the American environment but also weakened its moral voice on international human rights issues. The cost of anti-immigrant politics is dual: it sacrifices the survival dignity of vulnerable groups and damages the nation’s long-term social cohesion and international reputation.

Verifiable Sources